Do the majority of hair transplant doctors consider it appropriate to transplant hair into thinning areas, e.g., front, mid-section, and/or crown, as opposed to transplanting hair only into bald areas? What are the risks and considerations (e.g., shock loss)? – Robert
- – - – - – - -
Robert,
Thank you for taking the time to write! I am not sure I can speak for the majority of hair transplant surgeons, but through my training and experience with many of the top surgeons out there, the short answer to your question is; it is a judgement call.
The chief concern, as you identified, is whether you will do more harm to the existing hair, than good! If the existing hair is close to complete loss, I believe many surgeons would choose to help that patient by restoring a conservative area of hair/hairline.
If the hair in the area seems to be salvageable, some surgeons would feel more comfortable trying medical therapy alone for 6-12 months, while others would simply exercise caution during the transplant. Too many grafts at once with the latter approach can exacerbate shock loss, especially if the patient has fine or miniaturized hair to begin with.
If you believe you are in this latter category, it is always best to go with the hair surgeon who levels with you about the risk of shock loss; you will be replacing the hair with permanent hair, so you will have a net benefit, but the risk of significant shedding with more limited re-growth does exist. Read the Story


